Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Appl. cancer res ; 38: 1-5, jan. 30, 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS, Inca | ID: biblio-910472

ABSTRACT

Background: The creation and evolution of research nurse, connected with some specialty, brings a new path to be covered and structured inside nursering. The position of Researcher Nurse was initially created decentralized only one Department. In past the years and after the role of work was being consolidating. This paper describes the creations and evolution of Research Nurses in the scene an Oncology Research Practice at a Cancer Center. Methods: Behind of a timeline description the information that in 10 years give us the number of participant departments increased, with an increase of the scientific production, besides the construction of the position of Research Nurses. Results: Throughout these years, integration and interdepartmental action were developed, with a role and seat in Biobanco, Ethics Committee in Research, Operative Systems of medical Informatics, as well as participation in multicentric, institutional projects within the Brazilian and world Oncology. Conclusions: The role of Research Nurses being


Subject(s)
Humans , Oncology Nursing/standards , Clinical Nursing Research/standards , Nurse's Role , Brazil/epidemiology , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Nurse Clinicians
2.
Journal of Medical Education. 2006; 10 (1): 19-26
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-77949

ABSTRACT

Use of valid and reliable instruments is the important way for collecting data in quantitative researches. This study was conducted to examine the extent of factor analysis use for specifying construct validity of instruments in quantitative research papers published in an internationally recognized journal. An internationally recognized journal, Nursing Research, was chosen for the review. All articles published in 2003 in this journal were reviewed. Only quantitative research articles that used instruments in need of construct validity verification were included. Each article was completely reviewed to identify the methods of instrument validation. Among 55 research articles, 40 [73%] were quantitative. Among these 40 articles, 8 articles [20%] were dealing with developing an instrument and one article was a meta-analysis and these 9 articles were excluded. Of the other 31 articles, only 4 [12.9%] used a method for specifying the construct validity of the instrument in the study and 2 [6.5%] used factor analysis for establishing construct validity of the instrument. Although factor analysis is a well recognized method in establishing the construct validity but its use is much less than expected


Subject(s)
Reproducibility of Results , Clinical Nursing Research/standards , Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL